<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Easiest Way to Rank? Through Video.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fathomdelivers.com/blog/index.php" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fathomdelivers.com/blog/index.php/videos-seo-more-likely-to-rank/</link>
	<description>News, trends &#38; analysis from the online marketing experts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:28:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Darnell</title>
		<link>http://www.fathomdelivers.com/blog/index.php/videos-seo-more-likely-to-rank/#comment-6068</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Darnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 05:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathomseo.com/blog/?p=864#comment-6068</guid>
		<description>Hello Cliff,
Interesting to see how this prediction from 2 years ago has since moved even closer to the mainstream of online marketing. 

Video is now already viewed by most savvy marketers as a low hanging fruit in terms of SEO, because of the relatively low competition when compared to text search, not to mention that video&#039;s engagement rates are through the roof.

It&#039;s wirth noting that at the time of writing this - (March 2011) Search Engines still need help identifying video submissions and creating a video-sitemap is advisable for those vendors who wnat to ensure their video content investment is properly indexed.

Best,
Mike
http://treepodia.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Cliff,<br />
Interesting to see how this prediction from 2 years ago has since moved even closer to the mainstream of online marketing. </p>
<p>Video is now already viewed by most savvy marketers as a low hanging fruit in terms of SEO, because of the relatively low competition when compared to text search, not to mention that video&#8217;s engagement rates are through the roof.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s wirth noting that at the time of writing this &#8211; (March 2011) Search Engines still need help identifying video submissions and creating a video-sitemap is advisable for those vendors who wnat to ensure their video content investment is properly indexed.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Mike<br />
<a href="http://treepodia.com" rel="nofollow">http://treepodia.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly Powell</title>
		<link>http://www.fathomdelivers.com/blog/index.php/videos-seo-more-likely-to-rank/#comment-1732</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly Powell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathomseo.com/blog/?p=864#comment-1732</guid>
		<description>I would definitely agree that the easiest way to rank is through video. Search engines loves video content and video blogging are just everywhere. The importance of videos are rising nowadays and it is even used by marketers to do online business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would definitely agree that the easiest way to rank is through video. Search engines loves video content and video blogging are just everywhere. The importance of videos are rising nowadays and it is even used by marketers to do online business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L2</title>
		<link>http://www.fathomdelivers.com/blog/index.php/videos-seo-more-likely-to-rank/#comment-1728</link>
		<dc:creator>L2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathomseo.com/blog/?p=864#comment-1728</guid>
		<description>Video IS the future as Internet speeds keep increasing.  Was kinda&#039; hard to do on a 14.4 modem... lol

L2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Video IS the future as Internet speeds keep increasing.  Was kinda&#8217; hard to do on a 14.4 modem&#8230; lol</p>
<p>L2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

