<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do Meta Redirects Work?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fathomdelivers.com/blog/index.php" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fathomdelivers.com/blog/index.php/do-meta-redirects-work/</link>
	<description>News, trends &#38; analysis from the online marketing experts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:28:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Keough</title>
		<link>http://www.fathomdelivers.com/blog/index.php/do-meta-redirects-work/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Keough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 12:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fathomseo.com/blog/index.php/2007/09/04/do-meta-redirects-work/#comment-210</guid>
		<description>Gary, 

I agree that the server side redirects are the &quot;sure fire&quot; way. However, if you REALLY can&#039;t do a proper server side 301, there are also coldfusion, asp, php (and other methods) redirects that do not rely on the meta refresh.

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary, </p>
<p>I agree that the server side redirects are the &#8220;sure fire&#8221; way. However, if you REALLY can&#8217;t do a proper server side 301, there are also coldfusion, asp, php (and other methods) redirects that do not rely on the meta refresh.</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

