Loading...

Introducing Internet Video Marketing - Drive Sales & Leads For Your Business.
Watch The Video Demo! or watch all videos on our FathomSEO TV channel guide.

«  |  »

 

Another Paid Links Article – With A Twist

By Matt Keough | October 4, 2007


purges-payola.gifWhen Andy Greenberg at Forbes writes an article called “Google Purges The Payola”, it is bound to make search engine marketers take notice. It is a well-balanced article that uses the recent penalty that Google apparently applied to certain directories as catalyst to explore the whole question of paid links. The usual experts were consulted; Matt Cutts, Rand Fishkin, Michael Gray, Danny Sullivan and others are quoted. Anyone who reads Sphinn or follows search marketing closely won’t find jaw dropping revelations. I’d still encourage you to read the article, however. If you’re working at an SEO firm, there is a good chance your clients will ask you about it. Forewarned is forearmed.

Setting the questions raised in the article aside, I had to chuckle at one coincidence. A portion of the article addresses links appearing at websites that appear to have no relevance to the topic at hand.

To most users, the difference between sponsored links and advertisements is a blur. Take, for instance, the online site for the British magazine, New Scientist. Near the bottom of the New Scientist homepage are “sponsored links” that launch the curious to odd destinations including teeth whitening sites or German language sites that sell women’s shoes–places that are probably only marginally interesting to most New Scientist readers.

When I read the article, there were obviously labeled paid advertisements right next to the paragraph. All perfectly legit by anyone’s estimation, but the call to action to get you to buy one of these ads was “Buy a link here.” You could make an argument that the ads directly above it were of marginal interest to Forbes readers.

forbes-links-2.gif

Turns out the ads are served through JavaScript, so no natural or condensed link juice was flowing. Remember, buying links doesn’t have to be about the PageRank, people.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • email
  • Print
Want to know more about search?
Visit our search engine marketing forum.


Want to know more about online videos?
Stop by our Internet video marketing forum.


3 Comments »

Comments

3 Comments so far

  1. Mike Murray - October 5, 2007 at 10:42 am

    Good insights in addition to the article itself. The links plot thickens.

  2. Brandon Drury - October 5, 2007 at 3:45 pm

    Of course, the “Buy Link Here” is not how Google is detecting paid links. Many people think they can bypass paid link detection by using an image or javascript in place of text that may say “Sponsored listings, links, paid links” or whatever heading they may put above their outgoing paid links.

    It’s much more complicated than that. I know. I wrote the paid link detector at Text Link Center.

    Google is analyzing the tendencies and patterns of webmasters selling links to identify the links.

    So, in the end, it doesn’t matter how you display the heading or if you even display a head at all. Both Google and Text Link Center can find the paid links.

    Brandon

  3. Aurelius Tjin - October 8, 2007 at 7:33 am

    I believe the article “Google Purges the Payola” has stirred up some controversies lately. Buying links really doesn’t have anything to do with page ranking for that matter.

3 Responses to “Another Paid Links Article – With A Twist”


* required